2017年7月12日 星期三

Sunac Investment Calculated Risk, Not Gamble

What many people don't understand about investment is that investment is not a game of till death do us apart. Take Sunac (1918) as an example, there is no denying that Sun Hongbin is a gambler. That he was sentenced to jail once and went broke another time offer ample evidence of that. Still, that shouldn't deter one from investing in and prospering with Sunac.
The perception that Sunac is risky, due to its high leverage, conveniently overlooks its very strong property sales and undemanding valuation. July is likely the first time Sunac will sell CNY30 billion property in a single month. Damn that's a lot of money.

I am in on Sunac but that doesn't mean I will stick with the company no matter what. Sun's super aggressive approach my backfire some day, so the important thing is to have an exit mechanism. The company is actually very transparent as it releases monthly property sales.

Sunac shares have tripled from its low in 2016 yet its market cap is merely HK$60 billion. I am pretty confident it will become one of mainland's four largest property developer in a few years time. Sun Hong Kai properties, mostly just operate in one city - Hong Kong, has a market cap of more than HK$300 billion. The math part is easy,  the hard part is to embrace and manage risks.

沒有留言:

張貼留言

你巧勁啊

問題並不在於原意、初心是不是好,也不在於某一具體條款對行業內不同公司的影響,而是對於A4治國的擔憂甚或恐懼。 不能自己是個錘子,看到什麼都是釘子。經濟都什麼樣了,還要監管這個規範那個。更要命的是,整頓監管思路太直接太幼稚。哦,把房價弄下來,把教培打掉,然後也不讓玩遊戲,那麼大家都...