2017年11月9日 星期四

中國經濟脫胎換骨 投資需要與時俱進

野村的這篇報告值得投資者細細咀嚼,所謂士別三日當刮目相看,我為中國的進步感到驕傲。

具體至投資層面,“三日”可當做“十年”看待,十年河東十年河西,2007年之前的中國經濟擴張,無可諱言是以信貸推動以污染環境為代價的盲目擴張,但現在去產能去槓桿大幅提高環保標準,高端製造業崛起(當然距離製造強國尚遠),經濟增長由科技創新和消費升級兩頭馬車帶動。今時不同往日,如果還用舊眼光看今日中國經濟就是投資者的損失。

自己今年收穫最豐的四隻股票是騰訊(0700)、舜宇(2382)、吉利(0175)和融創(1918),也扣緊了科技創新和消費升級的主題。雖然股價今年至今升幅巨大,目前評估仍然有不俗增長空間。


Beyond credit growth: China’s learning curve 
Tactical long vs. structural long 
The listed corporates: moving up the learning curve, private or SOEs 
The well-known fact about China’s growth is the power of credit. The less well-known fact is the power of knowledge and learning. All three major participants in the economy – namely, the enterprises, the government and the households – had moved up the learning curve in the decade since GFC. A broader recognition of this second fact would make Chinese equities a structural long rather than a tactical long, in our view. Our last comparative study of the top two DM and EM equity pools showed that relative to underlying revenue growth, the China-listed non-financial corporates have invested most in R&D and capex vs its three peers since the GFC. Such spending is broad based by sector. Even the SOEs spent heavily on R&D and capex, although their returns have lagged that of the private sector’s listed enterprises. In this note, we detail the top 50 R&D spenders, capex spenders and combined spenders (Fig. 2-Fig. 4) among China’s listed non-financial companies.

沒有留言:

張貼留言

你巧勁啊

問題並不在於原意、初心是不是好,也不在於某一具體條款對行業內不同公司的影響,而是對於A4治國的擔憂甚或恐懼。 不能自己是個錘子,看到什麼都是釘子。經濟都什麼樣了,還要監管這個規範那個。更要命的是,整頓監管思路太直接太幼稚。哦,把房價弄下來,把教培打掉,然後也不讓玩遊戲,那麼大家都...