2017年7月23日 星期日

領克01車評

Auto Express' review of Link & Co 01.

領克01車評(部分我覺得有趣的草草翻譯了一下。)

We go for an exclusive ride in Lynk & Co’s first model, but does the 01 SUV have potential?

Verdict

The Lynk & Co 01 SUV is the first serious attempt by a Chinese brand at cracking Europe, and based on what we’ve seen, it’s going to succeed. Car sharing will target new customers, while the design language is a refreshing change.
(領克01是中國品牌第一次攻克歐洲市場的認真嘗試,根據我們所看到的成功可以預見。汽車互享針對新的目標客戶,而設計語言令人耳目一新。)
It’s two years away from launch, but Auto Express was invited to Lynk & Co’s home town of Gothenburg in Sweden to take an exclusive ride in the brand’s first model – the 01 SUV.
This isn’t only our first on-road experience of a Lynk & Co model, it’s also our first experience of a car using the new Compact Modular Architecture (CMA) platform, which has been jointly developed with Volvo and both firms’ Chinese parent company, Geely.
At 4,530mm long, the 01 sits somewhere between the Audi Q3 and Q5 in terms of size, but interior space is closer to the latter. A six-foot rear passenger can sit behind a similarly sized driver with room to spare.
(長4.53米,01的尺寸介乎奧迪Q3和Q5之間,但內部空間更接近Q5。一個六英呎高的乘客可以坐在差不多身材的前座乘客後面,還有些許活動空間。)
And before the car has even moved a wheel, the Audi comparisons don’t stop there. The quality of the early car we’re in is particularly impressive. The 01 will be built in China in a factory owned by Volvo, while the material quality of Lynk & Co’s first model seems on a par with its Swedish cousin, and close to that of Audi’s SUVs.
(還有更多與奧迪的相似之處,領克的質量令人印象深刻。01是由沃爾沃在中國的一家工廠生產,物料品質和它的瑞典表兄不相上下,接近奧迪的的SUV。)
The dash is fairly upright and topped by squishy plastics, while the standard 10-inch touchscreen dominates the cabin as much as connectivity dominates the whole Lynk & Co story. The front seats with their integral headrests are trimmed in leather in our car and feel Volvo comfy, while ahead of the driver is a TFT driver display.
Driver for our ride is Ola Hermansson, Lynk & Co’s vice-president of vehicles and architecture who’s led the 01 engineering project. “We wanted to give the car a sporty feel,” Hermansson told us. “We’ve prioritised handling and a fun to drive feeling, but with the very low levels of NVH (Noise, Vibration and Harshness). Chinese customers are very NVH driven,” he explained. “But it’s difficult to get that balance of being sporty and being quiet.”
Sure enough, our car is being used to test road noise, even though the first models are due to be built in just eight weeks. On the motorway, the engine is eerily silent, while there’s a faint rumble from the tyres but a more noticeable whoosh of wind noise from the oversized door mirrors.
As far as a sporty ride is concerned, the MacPherson strut front and multi-link rear suspension give a ride that’s certainly firm, but it feels more connected than harsh – at least on the Swedish roads around Lynk & Co’s Gothenburg sites. There doesn’t seem to be much body roll through corners, although Hermansson isn’t throwing the car around. “It’s still an SUV,” he reminded us, “so it won’t feel like a sports car”.
Performance from our car’s 188bhp 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol seems brisk enough, but Hermansson admitted that there’s not too much difference between that and the all-new 178bhp three-cylinder 1.5-litre engine. A hybrid version, he says, will produce around 222bhp, while the new seven-speed dual-clutch automatic in our car seems to be both responsive and smooth.
As well as testing the car at Volvo’s proving ground in Sweden and further north in the Arctic Circle, British firm Ricardo has been involved in the development of the 01 at its base in Shoreham-by-Sea, West Sussex and at Millbrook Proving Ground in Bedfordshire. Hopefully that will bode well for how the 01 behaves on British roads when it arrives in 2019.
一些讀者回應:
 
Looks quite good. Evidently properly engineered with Volvo help -as stated- but the pricing needs to be well below the eye-watering cost of current Volvos such as the XC60 if it is going to attract buyers. This will be seen as a Chinese car, no matter how well-engineered it might be.
(看上去挺不錯。顯然在沃爾沃幫助下工藝水平過關,但是如果要吸引買家,定價需要大幅低於沃爾沃現有的讓人倒吸一口冷氣的車型例如XC60。不管工藝水平多高,買家會覺得這是一輛中國造的車子。)

 
What a silly comment, the XC60 is cheaper than a Q5, cheaper than an Evoque, cheaper than an X3 and X1 and X5, on a par with the Merc GLA but cheaper than an all other Merc similar cars - so, the Volvo is a better well priced car - No i do not work for Volvo, but Volvo is and always has been well priced against the competition.
(這評論忒差了。XC60定價低於Q5,比Evoque還便宜,也比X3、X1和X5便宜,和奔馳的GLA差不多但是比所有其他奔馳相似的車型便宜。所以沃爾沃的車價錢公道。不,我不在沃爾沃打工,但沃爾沃的定價和競爭對手相比意向公道。)

沒有留言:

張貼留言

你巧勁啊

問題並不在於原意、初心是不是好,也不在於某一具體條款對行業內不同公司的影響,而是對於A4治國的擔憂甚或恐懼。 不能自己是個錘子,看到什麼都是釘子。經濟都什麼樣了,還要監管這個規範那個。更要命的是,整頓監管思路太直接太幼稚。哦,把房價弄下來,把教培打掉,然後也不讓玩遊戲,那麼大家都...